The provision of the Police Act, which
prohibits a female officer from marrying a man of her choice without the
permission of the Commissioner of Police in the command where she is
serving, has been declared illegal and unconstitutional by a Federal
High Court in Ikeja, Lagos.
Trial judge, Justice Steven Adah, rejected the arguments of the
Attorney-General of the Federation and held that Regulation 124 was
illegal, null and void due to its inconsistency with Section 42 of the
1999 Constitution.
The court declared the Regulation unconstitutional and proceeded to annul pursuant to Section 1(3) of the Constitution.
Women Empowerment and Legal Aid Initiative, WELA, had brought the
suit, challenging the constitutional validity of the said Regulation
124.
The said Regulation states: “A woman police officer who is desirous
of marrying must first apply in writing to the Commissioner of Police
for the state command in which she is serving, requesting permission to
marry and giving name, address and occupation of the person she intends
to marry. Permission will be granted for the marriage if the intended
husband is of good character and the woman police officer has served in
the force for a period of not less than three years.”
WELA counsel had arguing that it was illegal to ban a woman police
officer for three years before entering into a marriage and that seeking
permission of a Police Commissioner was an infraction of her
fundamental right to dignity and freedom of choice.
The group had contended that since a male police officer was not
subjected to the same inhibitions, Regulation 124 was inconsistent with
section 42 of the constitution and Article 2 of the African Charter on
Human and Peoples’ Rights, which have prohibited discrimination on the
basis of sex.
The group had asked the court to expunge the said Regulation from the
Police Act, as it was not justifiable in a democratic state such as
Nigeria, which had domesticated the African Charter on Human and Peoples
Rights and ratified the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and
People Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa and the Convention on
the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women, CEDAW..
Attorney-General of the Federation, through his counsel, had
contended that the said regulation was designed to protect women police
officers from falling into the hands of criminals, adding that the
purpose of the law was to prevent women police officers from marrying
men of bad character.
The AGF further contended that the three-year ban was meant to ensure
that a woman police officer was not pregnant “during the rigorous
training she must undergo after her employment.”
Culled: Vanguard
No comments:
Post a Comment